Vietnam: Guidelines for assessment and classification of official performance at the end of 2020

Before December 15, 2020, officials and public employees at agencies and public service providers must complete the year-end 2020 quality evaluation and classification. LAWNET sends to esteemed Customers and Members the guidelines for assessment and classification the year-end 2020 quality of officials.

Assessment  and  Classification  of  Official  Quality,  Decree  90/2020/ND-CP

Vietnam: Guidelines for assessment and classification of official performance at the end of 2020 (Illustrative photo)

1. Authority for assessment and classification of Vietnamese officials

According to Article 16 of Decree 90/2020/ND-CP on the assessment and classification of officials and public employees, the authority to assess and classify the quality of officials is defined as follows:

- The assessment and classification of the quality of the head of an agency, organization, or unit is carried out by the head of the directly managing superior agency;

- The assessment and classification of the deputy head and officials under management are carried out by the head of the agency using the officials.

2. Criteria for classification of Vietnamese officials

From Articles 8 to 11 of Decree 90/2020/ND-CP, the specific criteria for classifying the quality of officials are regulated as follows:

Level

Officials without leadership positions

Officials with leadership positions

Outstanding completion of tasks

- Adhering well to regulations on political ideology, ethics, lifestyle, work style, working discipline, and organizational discipline;

- Completing 100% of tasks as stipulated by law, according to the set plan, or as specifically assigned, ensuring timeliness, quality, and high efficiency, with at least 50% of tasks completed beyond expectations.

- Adhering well to regulations on political ideology, ethics, lifestyle, work style, working discipline, and organizational discipline;

- Fulfilling all task-related criteria stipulated by law, according to the plan set, or as specifically assigned, ensuring timeliness, high quality, and efficiency;

- Leading, directing, and managing the assigned agencies, organizations, units, or sectors to fulfill all targets and tasks, with at least 50% of targets and tasks completed beyond expectations;

- 100% of agencies, organizations, and units under direct management are assessed as completing tasks, with at least 70% assessed as completing well or excellently.

Good completion of tasks

- Meeting criteria in political ideology, ethics, lifestyle, work style, working discipline, and organizational discipline;

- Completing 100% of tasks as stipulated by law, according to the plan set, or as specifically assigned, ensuring timeliness, quality, and efficiency.

- Meeting criteria in political ideology, ethics, lifestyle, work style, working discipline, and organizational discipline;

- Fulfilling all task-related criteria stipulated by law, according to the set plan, or as specifically assigned, ensuring timeliness, quality, and efficiency;

- Leading, directing, and managing the assigned agencies, organizations, units, or sectors to fulfill all targets and tasks, with at least 80% completed timely and ensuring quality;

- 100% of agencies, organizations, and units under direct management are assessed as completing tasks.

Completion of tasks

- Meeting criteria in political ideology, ethics, lifestyle, work style, working discipline, and organizational discipline;

- Fulfilling all task-related criteria stipulated by law, according to the set plan, or as specifically assigned, with no more than 20% of criteria failing to meet quality, timeliness, or efficiency standards.

.

- Meeting criteria in political ideology, ethics, lifestyle, work style, working discipline, and organizational discipline;

- Fulfilling all task-related criteria stipulated by law, according to the set plan, or as specifically assigned, with no more than 20% of criteria failing to meet quality, timeliness, or efficiency standards;

- Leading, directing, and managing the assigned agencies, organizations, units, or sectors to complete over 70% of targets and tasks;

- At least 70% of agencies, organizations, and units under direct management are assessed as completing tasks.

Failure to complete tasks

 

- Exhibiting signs of political, ethical, or lifestyle degradation, self-evolution, or self-transformation as evaluated by the competent authority;

- More than 50% of task-related criteria stipulated by law, according to the set plan, or as specifically assigned, failing to meet timeliness, quality, or efficiency standards;

- Having acts of violation in the performance of duties leading to disciplinary action within the assessment year.

- Exhibiting signs of political, ethical, or lifestyle degradation, self-evolution, or self-transformation as evaluated by the competent authority;

- More than 50% of task-related criteria stipulated by law, according to the set plan, or as specifically assigned, failing to meet timeliness, quality, or efficiency standards;

- The assigned agency, organization, unit, or sector completing less than 50% of targets and tasks;

- Agencies, organizations, or units under direct management involved in embezzlement, corruption, waste, and subjected to legal action;

- Having acts of violation in the performance of duties leading to disciplinary action within the assessment year.

 

3. Procedure for assessing and classifying the quality of officials

According to Article 18 of Decree 90/2020/ND-CP, the procedure for assessing and classifying the quality of officials consists of four specific steps as follows:

Step 1: Self-assessment and classification by the official

Officials prepare a self-assessment report on work results according to the assigned tasks in the standard form, Appendix No.02 attached to Decree 90/2020/ND-CP.

Step 2: Remarks and assessment by the agency

At the workplace, the agency, organization, or unit where the official works will hold a meeting to comment, assess the official's quality. The official presents the self-assessment report, members in the meeting provide feedback, and these comments must be recorded in minutes and approved.

Step 3: Consideration and decision on assessment and classification

The head of the agency, organization, or unit, based on opinions expressed in the meeting, decides on the content of the assessment and the classification level of the official's quality.

Step 4: Written notification

The competent authority for assessment will notify the official in writing and publicly disclose the assessment results within the agency, organization, or unit where the official works. The form of disclosure prioritizes electronic environments.

4. Timing for the annual assessment and classification of officials

According to Article 20 of Decree 90/2020/ND-CP, the timing for the annual assessment and classification of officials is conducted before December 15 each year, before the assessment and classification of party members and the annual review of commendations and awards of the agency, organization, or unit. For public service providers operating in fields of education, training, and other sectors concluding their work year before December, the head of the service provider will decide on the timing for assessment and classification of public employees.

>>> See more: Assessment and Classification Form for Officials and Public Employees at the end of 2020

Le Vy

>> CLICK HERE TO READ THIS ARTICLE IN VIETNAMESE

0 lượt xem
  • Address: 19 Nguyen Gia Thieu, Vo Thi Sau Ward, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City
    Phone: (028) 7302 2286
    E-mail: info@lawnet.vn
Parent company: THU VIEN PHAP LUAT Ltd.
Editorial Director: Mr. Bui Tuong Vu - Tel. 028 3935 2079
P.702A , Centre Point, 106 Nguyen Van Troi, Ward 8, Phu Nhuan District, HCM City;