What are the guidelines for completing sefl-reviews made in Form 02B by teachers in Vietnam?

What are the guidelines for completing sefl-reviews made in Form 02B by teachers in Vietnam?

Form 02B-HD KD.DG applicable to individuals who hold leading or managerial positions is issued along with Guidance 25-HD/BTCTW 2023.

Download Form 02B-HD KD.DG 2023 here

Guidelines for completing sefl-reviews made in Form 02B by teachers

- Fill in the name of the CPV committee or cell at the top of the page.

- Record the day, month, and year of the preparation of the review.

- Complete all personal information, full name, date of birth, work unit (school or your workplace), and the CPV cell you are a part of.

I. Advantages and Achievements

1. Regarding political qualities, ethics, lifestyle; solidarity spirit within the organization; sense of discipline, responsibility for setting examples, adherence to what Party members must not do; work style and behavior. Relate to manifestations of degradation, "self-evolution", and "self-transformation".

2. Execution of duties and responsibilities and achievement of assigned yearly targets and tasks.

3. Results in leading, directing, managing, administering; performance of duties and responsibilities; completeness of tasks of managed organizations, agencies, and units; ability to gather and build internal solidarity.

4. Responsibility in work; dynamic, innovative spirit, daring to think, do, and take responsibility; handling difficult, complex, sensitive issues in task execution.

5. Personal and family exemplification; combating corruption, negativity, and wastefulness; trust of officials and Party members.

Self-assessment on the level of execution in the following levels: Excellent > Good > Average > Poor

6. Commitment to self-training, striving yearly:

I constantly cultivate revolutionary ethics, and continuously learn and develop myself to fulfill leadership and teaching tasks better.

II. Limitations, Deficiencies, and Causes

1. Limitations, Deficiencies:

- Insufficient monitoring in managing teaching quality:

- Incomplete comprehensive innovation in education management:

- Low effectiveness in human resource management and task assignment:

- Inefficient management of resources and teaching equipment use:

2. Causes of Limitations and Deficiencies:

- Objective Causes:

+ The workload in school management is quite large and complex, with many simultaneous tasks such as student management, teacher management, movement activities, and school events. This makes it difficult to closely monitor each specific job.

+ The rapid changes in education policies and demands for improving teaching methods and applying technology in education require time for teachers to familiarize and adapt. The preparation of the teaching staff in school is not uniform, leading to difficulties in comprehensive innovation.

- Subjective Causes:

+ Inefficient time arrangement: In the management role, I sometimes prioritize administrative duties and professional work too much, limiting time for teaching supervision and monitoring.

+ Lack of breakthrough initiatives in staff allocation and teacher activity management. Task assignment sometimes does not match individual capacity and expertise, leading to work efficiency not meeting expectations.

+ Limited ability to guide teachers in using new technology and teaching equipment. I need to enhance my skills in resource and equipment management, as well as support teachers in applying new technologies in teaching.

III. Results in Overcoming Limitations, Deficiencies Concluded by Authorities or Pointed out in Previous Evaluations

- Monitoring teaching quality: I have attended class observations, required periodic reports from subject groups, and clarified assignment duties in the school board. However, supervision has not been consistent across all subjects.

- Innovating education management: Some improvements have been implemented, especially applying technology in teaching. However, due to teachers' unfamiliarity, effectiveness has not met required expectations.

- Managing human resources and task assignment: Task assignment has been adjusted according to teacher capacity, a feedback channel has been created to gather opinions. Initial results show improvements in some movements, but ongoing monitoring is needed.

- Use of teaching equipment: Organized training sessions on technology use, but teachers still face difficulties and need continued support.

Self-assessment on the level of execution: Self-assessment in the following levels: Excellent > Good > Average > Poor

VI. Directions and Measures for Correcting Limitations, Deficiencies

- Enhance teaching supervision: Clearly assign supervision duties within the school board, regularly observe classes and gather feedback from students.

- Innovate management work: Strengthen technology skill training for teachers, encourage them to experiment with new methods, and facilitate participation in professional development.

- Enhance human resource management effectiveness: Periodically evaluate teachers' capacity, assign tasks appropriately, and strengthen motivation and rewards to encourage movement participation.

- Efficient use of equipment: Continue organizing training on technology use, monitor equipment use effectiveness, and facilitate experience sharing among teachers.

VII. Self-assessment and grading of quality

1. Grading of officials and public employees:

- Excellent completion of the assigned tasks

- Good completion of the assigned tasks

- Completion of the assigned tasks

- Non-completion of the assigned tasks

2. Grading of communist party members:

- Excellent completion of the assigned tasks

- Good completion of the assigned tasks

- Completion of the assigned tasks

- Non-completion of the assigned tasks

What are the guidelines for completing sefl-reviews made in Form 02B by teachers in Vietnam? (Image from Internet)

Where do teachers in Vietnam make their self-reviews?

According to Article 7 Decision 124-QD/TW 2023, teachers in Vietnam make their self-reviews at:

- CPV committees, CPV organizations, collective leadership, and management at any level conduct self-criticism and criticism at that level.

- Communist party members make their self-reviews at the CPV cell where they participate.

- Leaders and managers generally make their self-reviews at two places (at the CPV cell where they participate and the leadership collective at the workplace); assessment and grading of communist party members are done at the CPV cell, while assessment and grading of officials and public employees are done at the highest position held.

For officials holding multiple leading or managerial positions, review must also be conducted elsewhere as regulated.

What are the steps for annual assessment and grading of quality of teachers in Vietnam?

The steps for annual assessment and grading of quality of teachers in Vietnam are done according to Clause 2, Article 11 Decision 124-QD/TW 2023 as follows:

- Step 1: Collective and individual self-assesses and grades.

Based on the grading criteria, each organization, collective, and individual analyzes and grades quality into one of the four levels as prescribed in Article 12.

- Step 2: Appraisal and proposal for grading level.

Based on self-assessment and grading results of the collective, individual, and opinions from relevant agencies, the agency advising on personnel and organization appraises and proposes the quality grading level.

- Step 3: The authorized level decides the quality grading level.

After assessment and grading results, if collectives or individuals make complaints or accusations on signs of Party discipline violation, national law, or internal disunity, the superior CPV committee directs to check, verify, appraise, and reconsider the assessment and grading results.