What is time limit for considering and deciding to send drug addicts from 12 years old to under 18 years old to compulsory rehabilitation facilities in Vietnam?

What is time limit for considering and deciding to send drug addicts from 12 years old to under 18 years old to compulsory rehabilitation facilities in Vietnam?

At Article 8 of Ordinance on Order and Procedures of the People Court to consider and decide on sending drug addicts from 12 years old to under 18 years old to the compulsory rehabilitation facility regulates the time limit for considering and deciding on admission to compulsory rehabilitation facilities:

Within 15 days from the date the Court accepts the request from the Head of the Department of Labor, War Invalids and Social Affairs, the Court must issue one of the decisions specified in Point i, Clause 4, Article 21 of this Ordinance ; For complicated cases, this time limit may be extended but must not exceed 30 days.

What is process of receiving and processing applications for admission to compulsory rehabilitation facilities for drug addicts from 12 years old to under 18 years old in Vietnam?

According to Article 9 of the Ordinance on Order and Procedures of the People Court to consider and decide on sending drug addicts from 12 years old to under 18 years old to the compulsory rehabilitation facility regulations on receiving and processing applications for admission to compulsory rehabilitation facilities, as follows:

1. When receiving the requested dossier transferred by the Head of the Department of Labor, War Invalids and Social Affairs, the Court must record the delivery and receipt; In case the dossier does not have enough documents as prescribed in Clause 4, Article 34 of the Law on Drug Prevention and Control, the Court will return the dossier and clearly state the reason.

2. Within 01 working day from the date of receiving the complete dossier as prescribed in Clause 4, Article 34 of the Law on Drug Prevention and Control, the Court must accept the case and assign a Judge to consider and resolve it.

What is time limit for considering and deciding to send drug addicts from 12 years old to under 18 years old to compulsory rehabilitation facilities in Vietnam? (Image from the Internet)

What is assignment of Judge to consider and decide on sending drug addicts from 12 years old to under 18 years old to compulsory rehabilitation facilities in Vietnam?

Pursuant Article 10 Ordinance on Order and Procedures of the People Court to consider and decide on sending drug addicts from 12 years old to under 18 years old to the compulsory rehabilitation facility stipulates that judges will be assigned to consider and decide to place them in a mandatory rehabilitation facility, accordingly:

1. Within the time limit specified in Clause 2, Article 9 of this Ordinance, the Chief Justice of the Court assigns a Judge to consider and decide to send the person to a compulsory rehabilitation facility. The assigned judge must be a person who has been trained or has experience in handling cases related to people under 18 years old or has the necessary knowledge about psychology and educational science for people under 18 years old.

2. The assigned judge must refuse to consider or decide if there are clear grounds to believe that they may not be impartial while performing their duties.

3. In case the assigned Judge cannot continue to perform his duties or is in a situation where he must refuse to consider or decide, the Chief Justice of the Court will assign another Judge to consider and decide to send him to a rehabilitation facility. obligatory.

What are cases where it is necessary to refuse or change Judges or Session Clerks with drug addicts from 12 years old to under 18 years old in Vietnam?

At Article 11 Ordinance on Order and Procedures of the People Court to consider and decide on sending drug addicts from 12 years old to under 18 years old to the compulsory rehabilitation facility stipulates cases in which judges and session secretaries must be refused or changed, accordingly:

1. Be a relative of the person being proposed.

2. Considered and decided to send to a mandatory rehabilitation facility in the same case.

3. Has resolved complaints, petitions, and protests against the decision to send to a compulsory rehabilitation facility in the same case.

4. There are other clear grounds to believe that they may not be impartial while on duty.

Best regards!