Do Officers Who Have Worked for Less Than 6 Months in a Year Get Performance Evaluation and Classification?
Are officials who have not worked for a full 06 months within the year evaluated and graded for quality?
Based on Clause 3 Article 2 of Decree 90/2020/ND-CP as supplemented by Clause 1 Article 1 of Decree 48/2023/ND-CP, the regulations are as follows:
Principles for evaluating and grading the quality of officials and public employees
Ensure objectivity, fairness, and accuracy; avoid bias, vindictiveness, favoritism, and formality; ensure proper authority in managing and evaluating officials and public employees.
The evaluation and grading of quality must be based on the responsibilities and tasks assigned and the results of task performance, demonstrated through specific work and products; for officials and public employees in leadership and management positions, it must be linked to the performance results of the agencies, organizations, and units they are managing or responsible for.
3. officials and public employees who have not worked for a full 06 months within the year will not undergo evaluation or quality grading, but still must review their work period within the year, except for maternity leave according to policy.
officials and public employees who are on leave from work according to legal regulations for a period from 03 months to under 06 months within the year are still evaluated but not graded for quality at the level of successfully completing the task or higher.
officials and public employees on maternity leave according to legal regulations will have their annual quality grading result reflect the evaluation of their actual working period within that year.
...
According to these regulations, officials who have not worked for a full 06 months within the year will not undergo quality evaluation and grading but still must review their work period within the year, except for maternity leave according to policy.
Are officials who have not worked for a full 06 months within the year evaluated and graded for quality? (Image from the Internet)
How is the archival of quality evaluation and grading documents for officials conducted?
According to Article 22 of Decree 90/2020/ND-CP as amended by Clause 2 Article 1 of Decree 48/2023/ND-CP regarding the archival of quality evaluation and grading documents for officials and public employees, the rules are as follows:
Archival of quality evaluation and grading documents for officials and public employees
Quality evaluation and grading documents are archieved electronically, including:
Minutes of the meeting for comments and evaluations.
Evaluation and grading forms of officials and public employees.
Comments from the party committee at the workplace (if any).
Written conclusions and notifications on the results of quality evaluation and grading of officials and public employees by the competent authority.
Records of resolving complaints about the results of quality evaluation and grading of officials and public employees (if any).
Other related documents (if any).
Besides electronic archiving, documents specified in Clauses 2 and 4 of this Article are also archived in written form in the personnel records of officials and public employees.
Thus, the archival of quality evaluation and grading documents for officials will be conducted electronically. In addition, they are also archived in written form in the personnel records.
Quality evaluation and grading documents archived electronically include:
- Minutes of the meeting for comments and evaluations.
- Evaluation and grading forms of officials and public employees.
- Comments from the party committee at the workplace (if any).
- Written conclusions and notifications on the results of quality evaluation and grading of officials and public employees by the competent authority.
- Records of resolving complaints about the results of quality evaluation and grading of officials and public employees (if any).
- Other related documents (if any).
What purposes does the use of the quality evaluation results for officials serve?
According to Article 21 of Decree 90/2020/ND-CP, the usage of quality evaluation results for officials and public employees is regulated as follows:
Usage of quality evaluation results for officials and public employees
The results of quality evaluation and grading of officials and public employees serve as the basis for arranging, using, training, fostering, promoting, or advancing professional titles, planning, appointing, dismissing, transferring, rotating, secondment, awarding, disciplining, evaluating and grading party members, and implementing other policies related to officials and public employees.
Thus, the use of quality evaluation results for officials serves the purpose of being the basis for arranging, using, training, promoting, or advancing professional titles and other policies related to officials.
Respectfully!
