Annual Party Member Self-Assessment Report for Individuals Not Holding Leadership or Management Positions in Accordance with the Latest Guide 25-HD/BTCTW
What is the format of the latest year-end party member's self-criticism form for individuals without leadership or management positions according to Guideline 25-HD/BTCTW?
The latest year-end party member's self-criticism form for individuals without leadership or management positions is carried out according to Form 02A-HD KD.DG 2023 issued with Guideline 25-HD/BTCTW in 2023.
Download the latest year-end party member’s self-criticism form for individuals without leadership or management positions here.
The latest year-end party member's self-criticism form for individuals without leadership or management positions according to Guideline 25-HD/BTCTW (Image from the Internet).
How to write the latest year-end party member's self-criticism form for individuals without leadership or management positions according to Guideline 25-HD/BTCTW?
Below is how to write the latest year-end self-criticism form in 2023 for individuals without leadership or management positions that can be referenced:
* Fill in the basic information:
- Full name: Write in uppercase (e.g., NGUYEN VAN A)
- Date of birth: Write in the format dd/mm/yyyy
- Unit of work: Write the name of the unit where you are working
- Cell Party: Write the name of the cell party where you are participating
* Self-criticism content
I. Strengths, achieved results
[1] Regarding political qualities, ethics, lifestyle; spirit of solidarity and unity within the organization; sense of discipline, leading responsibility, compliance with party rules; working style and manners. Connect with manifestations of regression, "self-evolution," "self-transformation"
- Self-assess the level of performance: tick one of the boxes below
□ Excellent □ Good □ Average □ Poor
[2] Implementation of tasks, powers, and results of achieving assigned targets and tasks in the year.
- Self-assess the level of performance: tick one of the boxes below
□ Excellent □ Good □ Average □ Poor
[3] Implementation of annual training and striving commitments.
II. Limitations, shortcomings, and causes
[1] Limitations, shortcomings
Analyze the limitations and shortcomings based on 03 contents in the section "Strengths, achieved results":
Includes:
- Regarding political ideology; ethics, lifestyle; sense of discipline; working style and manners;
- Regarding the execution of assigned duties and responsibilities;
- Implementation of annual self-training and striving commitments.
For example: Not yet boldly proposing suggestions, advising...
[2] Causes of limitations, shortcomings
Self-identify the causes of the aforementioned limitations and shortcomings.
III. Results of overcoming the limitations and shortcomings pointed out by competent authorities or from previous self-criticism sessions
Clearly review each limitation and shortcoming (already resolved; currently resolving, degree of resolution; not yet resolved); difficulties and obstacles (if any); individual responsibility.
- Self-assess the level of performance: tick one of the boxes below
□ Excellent □ Good □ Average □ Poor
IV. Explain issues raised for review (if any)
Explain each issue raised for review, indicating causes, and determining individual responsibility for each issue raised for review.
V. Clarify individual responsibility for collective limitations and shortcomings (if any)
VI. Direction, measures to overcome limitations, shortcomings
For example:
- Strive to promote strengths, overcome criticism and self-criticism by peers, and be bold and active in contributing opinions during cell party activities. In the process of solving tasks, be flexible, proactive but cautious, show a determined attitude, and be firm in combating and minimizing corrupt behaviors and wrongdoings of comrades and colleagues, thereby contributing to building a strong Communist Party and government;
- Be self-aware in studying, actively research to update knowledge, and new legal documents to continually improve skills and working capacity, creating a basis to propagate legal knowledge and Communist Party and state policies to all citizens;
- Be self-aware of cultivating impartial, objective, sincere traits, and boldly speaking the truth;
- Regularly and actively cultivate and practice ethical living standards to enhance political theory knowledge and professional expertise.
VII. Self-assessment of performance rating
Self-assess and tick one of the performance levels
- Ranking officials and public employees:
□ Completed work excellently
□ Completed work well
□ Completed work
□ Did not complete work
- Ranking party members:
□ Completed work excellently
□ Completed work well
□ Completed work
□ Did not complete work
End: Sign and clearly state the name of the party member performing the evaluation
What are the methods, processes, responsibilities, and authorities in evaluating and ranking year-end Communist Party members?
In Section 3 of Guideline 25-HD/BTCTW in 2023 it is clearly stated the methods, processes, responsibilities, and authorities in evaluating and ranking year-end Communist Party members as follows:
(1) Evaluating and ranking grassroots party organizations
- Communist Party committee at sections; cell parties affiliated with grassroots party committees; cell parties affiliated with sectional party committees self-evaluate and rank the quality of their party units. The grassroots party committee considers and evaluates the quality ranking of affiliated party organizations.
- The standing committee of grassroots party committees; grassroots party committees (where there is no standing committee); the cell party of grassroots units affiliated with district-level committees and equivalents self-assess and rank the quality. The standing committee of district-level committees and equivalents consider, decide on the quality evaluation, and ranking of the party organizations stated in this clause.
- For grassroots units directly under provincial committees, city committees, and central union party committees, the standing committee of the provincial-level committee and equivalents consider, decide on quality evaluation and ranking.
(2) Evaluating and ranking district-level party committees and equivalents
- District-level committees and equivalents self-evaluate and rank the quality of their party committees.
- The standing committee of provincial-level committees and equivalents consider and decide on the quality evaluation and ranking of the subordinate party committees.
(3) Evaluating and ranking provincial-level party committees and equivalents
- Provincial-level committees and equivalents self-evaluate and rank their party committee's quality and are responsible to the Politburo.
- The Central Organizing Committee presides over aggregating results, reporting to the Politburo according to regulations. For places with signs of violations; occurring complex and troubling issues with public outcry; having complaints and denunciations; internal disunity; violating Communist Party principles and regulations, especially the principle of democratic centralism; manifestations of “group interests,” corruption, negative, regression, “self-evolution,” “self-transformation”; having individuals under management being disciplined, prosecuted; stagnating, weak, not completing assigned responsibilities and tasks, the Central Organizing Committee cooperates with related agencies to verify, re-evaluate the quality ranking results, report to the Politburo for consideration as per authority.
LawNet