Notes on the Classification of Communist Party Members. Procedures for Evaluating and Classifying Communist Party Members according to Regulation 124
How is a Communist Party member disciplined by reprimand classified at the end of the year?
Based on the provisions of Article 12 Regulation 124-QD/TW of 2023, there are 4 levels for classifying the quality of Communist Party members:
- Complete the tasks excellently- Complete the tasks well- Complete the tasks- Fail to complete the tasks
For the case of a Communist Party member who has been disciplined in the evaluation year, subsection 4.3, clause 4, Article 12 of Regulation 124-QD/TW of 2023 states as follows:
Classification criteria
...
4. Fail to complete the tasks
Applies to collectives and individuals with evaluation criteria at the "Poor" level or who fall into one of the following cases:
...
4.3. For individuals
...
d)** Disciplined during the evaluation year (except for cases of self-detection and rectification of consequences).***
Thus, according to the above regulation, a Communist Party member disciplined by reprimand in the evaluation year will be classified as failing to complete the tasks (except for cases of self-detection and rectification of consequences).
What are the notes on classifying Communist Party members? Evaluation and classification process according to Regulation 124? (Image from Internet)
What are the notes on classifying Communist Party members?
Based on the provisions of clause 4, Article 12 Regulation 124-QD/TW of 2023, when classifying Communist Party members, the following points should be noted:
- Communist Party members with violations occurring in the previous year, before the evaluation classification time but during the evaluation year, the Communist Party member is disciplined, the higher-level Party organization with authority shall base the form of discipline, content, motivation, nature, extent, consequences, causes of violations, and specific circumstances to consider re-evaluation and re-classification at the time the fault, violation occurred.
- For violations at the old organization but disciplined at the new organization, the results are calculated in the evaluation and classification of the old organization (not holding the new organization responsible).
- For violations occurring at both the old and new organizations, disciplined and enforced at the old organization and the new organization, the form of discipline is calculated in the evaluation and classification results according to the time the violation was identified at each organization.
Evaluation and classification process for Communist Party members according to Regulation 124?
Based on the provisions of Article 11 Regulation 124-QD/TW of 2023 as follows:
Methodology, evaluation and classification process
1. Based on the evaluation criteria, quality classification criteria specified for each collective and individual, and the opinions of relevant evaluation agencies, determine the level of each criterion according to 4 levels (Excellent, Good, Average, Poor), which serves as the basis for the competent authority to comment, evaluate, and classify the quality for each collective and individual.
2. The annual quality evaluation and classification for collectives and individuals are conducted in 3 steps:
- Step 1: Collective and individual self-evaluation and classification.
Based on the classification criteria, each organization, collective, and individual self-analyses quality and classifies into one of 4 levels as specified in Article 12.
- Step 2: Assessment and proposal for classification.
On the basis of self-evaluation and classification results of the collective and individual, and the opinions of related agencies, the advising organization assesses and proposes a quality classification level.
- Step 3: The competent authority decides the quality classification.
For collectives and individuals, after obtaining the quality evaluation and classification results, if there are complaints, denouncements, signs of party discipline violations, state law violations, internal disunity, the direct higher-level Party Committee shall direct inspection, verification, and reassessment of the evaluation and classification results.
Thus, the annual quality evaluation and classification for collectives and individuals are performed in 3 steps:
- Step 1: Collective and individual self-evaluation and classification.
Based on the classification criteria, each organization, collective, and individual self-analyses quality and classifies into one of 4 levels as specified.
- Step 2: Assessment and proposal for classification.
On the basis of self-evaluation and classification results of the collective and individual, and the opinions of related agencies, the advising organization assesses and proposes a quality classification level.
- Step 3: The competent authority decides the quality classification.
For collectives and individuals, after obtaining the quality evaluation and classification results, if there are complaints, denouncements, signs of party discipline violations, state law violations, internal disunity, the direct higher-level Party Committee shall direct inspection, verification, and reassessment of the evaluation and classification results.
In particular, note the following order:
- Evaluating and classifying the activities of the government, professional work, and mass organizations first, then Party organizations; lower-level collectives first, followed by higher-level ones; leadership and management collectives first, followed by individual members.
- After completing the evaluation and classification of localities, organizations, agencies, and units, evaluate and classify the head.
- Uniformly implement evaluation and classification for organizations, leadership collectives, and management from grassroots to provincial levels, party committees, party groups, and party committees directly under the Central authority.
LawNet