Steps for Classifying Leaders and Managers: What are the Criteria for Classifying Leaders and Managers?
Steps to Classify Leadership and Management Officials
The steps to classify leadership and management officials are carried out according to Sub-item 2, Item III of Regulation 89-QD/TW Year 2017 as follows:
Step 1: Officials conduct self-assessment and determine their classification level.
Step 2: Review and evaluation of the officials:
- Direct superior conducts review and evaluation.- Peer group conducts review and evaluation.- Direct subordinates conduct review and evaluation (if necessary).
Step 3: Consider, decide on evaluation and classification:
- The organizational body of the competent authority compiles and assesses the documentation, procedures, and collected opinions from the committee at the workplace; local residential party organization; and the results of any trust votes (if available) according to the current regulations for reference; propose evaluation content and classification of the officials.- The collective leadership with authority over the officials discusses, considers, decides the content of the review, evaluation, and votes secretly to classify the officials.- Notify the evaluation content and classification results to the officials in writing; publicly disclose the evaluation results to the evaluated person and the competent authority according to regulations.
Step 4: Finalize and store the official records: The competent authority's organizational body finalizes and stores the evaluation records. Records include:
- The personal self-assessment report.- Review and evaluation report by the direct superior.- Review and evaluation report by the peer group or party organization.- Review and evaluation report by direct subordinates (if any).- Review and evaluation opinions from the committee at the workplace and residential committee.- Results of any trust votes according to current regulations (if any).
How many steps are involved in classifying leadership and management officials? What are the criteria for classifying leadership and management officials? (Image from the Internet)
Criteria Framework for Classifying Leadership and Management Officials
According to Sub-item 1, Item III of Regulation 89-QD/TW Year 2017, the criteria framework for classifying leadership and management officials at different levels is as follows:
Classification Criteria Framework
Annually, officials are classified according to the following levels and criteria framework:
1.1- Excellent completion of duties
- Exemplary in political ideology, ethics, lifestyle, work style, and organizational discipline awareness.
- All criteria for performance of duties are met with high quality, efficiency, and on schedule; has innovations and solutions applied effectively in practice.
- The local area, agency, or unit under charge meets all targets and duties, with at least 50% of core targets (duties) being exceeded. 100% of the agencies and units under direct leadership and management are classified as meeting duties, with at least 70% classified as well-done or above.
1.2- Good completion of duties
- Exemplary in political ideology, ethics, lifestyle, work style, and organizational discipline awareness.
- All criteria for performance of duties are met with guaranteed quality, efficiency, and on schedule.
- The local area, agency, or unit under charge meets all targets and duties, with at least 80% being on schedule and ensuring quality. 100% of the agencies and units under direct leadership and management are classified as meeting duties or above.
1.3- Completion of duties
- Exemplary in political ideology, ethics, lifestyle, work style, and organizational discipline awareness.
- All criteria for performance of duties are met, but up to 20% of criteria may not ensure quality, schedule, or efficiency.
- The local area, agency, or unit under charge meets over 70% of targets and duties. At least 70% of agencies and units under direct leadership and management are classified as meeting duties.
1.4- Failure to complete duties
Classification as failing to complete duties if falling into one of the following 5 cases:
- The competent authority managing the officials (according to current Communist Party regulations) evaluates as having signs of political ideology, ethics, lifestyle degradation, and self-transformation.
- More than 50% of the criteria for duties are evaluated as not met.
- The local area, agency, or unit under charge meets less than 50% of assigned or set targets and duties.
- The agency or unit under direct leadership and management is involved in embezzlement, corruption, and is disciplined according to the law.
- The individual is disciplined during the evaluation year.
There are 4 classification levels for leadership and management officials: excellent completion of duties, good completion of duties, completion of duties, and failure to complete duties.
Authority to Review and Evaluate Leadership and Management Officials
According to Sub-item 2, Item III of Regulation 89-QD/TW Year 2017, the authority, methods, processes, and timelines for evaluation and classification are as follows:
Authority, Methods, Processes, and Timelines for Evaluation and Classification
2.1- Authority to review and evaluate officials
- The entities with authority to review and evaluate officials include:
+ The officials themselves.
+ Direct subordinates (if necessary).
+ Collective leadership (peers) review and evaluate.
+ Direct superior reviews and evaluates.
- The competent authority managing the officials decides on the content of the review, evaluation, classification, and assessment of the officials’ direction and development prospects.
…….
Thus, the authority to review and evaluate leadership and management officials is implemented according to the regulations mentioned above.
LawNet
