What are guidelines on preparing the lesson "Quan thanh tra" for grade 12 students in Vietnam? What are the language proficiency requirements for grade 12 students in Vietnam?

Guidelines on preparing the lesson "Quan thanh tra" for grade 12 students in Vietnam

* Main content:

Humorous misunderstanding: Both the mayor and other officials mistake a rogue for an inspector general, leading to hilarious situations.

Social reflection: Through this event, the author exposes corruption, bribery, fear of power, and the ignorance of officials at that time.

Character traits: Each character clearly exhibits their personality through their words and actions. The mayor is greedy and cowardly; the postmaster is cunning and lazy; other officials are greedy and fearful.

* Art

Dialogue language: Lively, humorous dialogue underscores the distinct personalities of each character.

Humorous situations: The ironic and humorous situation where a rogue is revered as an official.

Use of artistic techniques: The author employs various artistic techniques such as exaggeration, irony, and satire to highlight the work's meaning.

* Analysis of excerpts

Excerpt 1: Upon receiving the letter, officials are extremely terrified, thinking it is from the inspector general. This indicates their fear of power and their corruption.

Excerpt 2: Upon reading the letter, officials realize they have been deceived. They are bewildered and angry but dare not do anything. This illustrates their cowardice and ineffectiveness.

Excerpt 3: The argument over who first said the rogue was the inspector general shows the blame-shifting and cowardice of the officials.

Excerpt 4: The announcement of the real inspector general's arrival causes extreme panic among the officials. This shows their fear of the law and punishment.

* Rhetorical devices

Exaggeration: Exaggerating the fear and cowardice of officials helps to highlight the humor of the situation.

Irony: The author uses many ironic statements to ridicule the stupidity and greed of the characters.

Satire: Through humorous situations, the author sharply criticizes the corruption and bureaucracy in society.

Comparison: Comparing officials to animals like pigs, gelding horses, etc., enhances the humor and the author's contempt.

* Significance

Social critique: The work strongly condemns corruption, bribery, and the moral decay of officials.

Laugh to realize: Through laughter, the author helps readers recognize the pressing issues of society.

Thought-provoking: The work raises questions about ethics, conscience, and human responsibility.

* Character images and significance

The mayor: The central character of the story. He is greedy, cowardly, and fears authority. The image of the mayor being deceived reveals the foolishness and baseness of the officialdom of that era.

The postmaster: Cunning, lazy, and opportunistic. This character represents opportunists who exploit situations for personal gain.

Other officials: Also as greedy and cowardly as the mayor. They represent a segment of corrupt and irresponsible officials.

The rogue: Although a trickster, he becomes the center of the event. This character symbolizes the randomness and irony in life.

* Conclusion

Through the above excerpts, we see Gogol's talent in using language, crafting situations, and developing characters. The work not only entertains but also provides profound social critique.