What are the regulations on assessment of learning results of students in Vietnam? - Kim Yen (Binh Thuan, Vietnam)
Regulations on assessment of learning results of students in Vietnam (Internet image)
This problem, LawNet would like to answer as follows:
Assessment of learning results of students according to the provisions of Article 9 of Circular 22/2021/TT-BGDDT is as follows:
* Learning results of students by subjects
For subjects assessed via feedback
- In a semester, learning results of each subject of a student shall be concluded as either: “Đạt” (Qualified), or “Chưa đạt” (Unqualified).
+ Qualified: When the student attends all examination and assessment under this Circular and obtain assessment at Qualified category.
+ Unqualified: Remaining cases.
- In a school year, learning results of each subject of a student shall be concluded as either: “Đạt” (Qualified), or “Chưa đạt” (Unqualified).
+ Qualified: Learning results of the 2nd semester is placed in Qualified category.
+ Unqualified: Learning results of the 2nd semester is placed in Unqualified category.
For subjects assessed via both feedback and scores
- Average score of a subject in a semester (hereinafter referred to as “DTBmhk”) is calculated as follows:
DTBmhk + |
TDDGtx + 2 x DDGgk + 3 x DDGck |
Number of DDGtx+ 5 |
- Average scores of the subject for the entire school year (referred to as “DTBmcn”) is calculated as follows:
DTBmcn + |
DTBmhkI + 2 x DTBmhkII |
3 |
DTBmhkI: Average score of the subject in the 1st semester.
DTBmhkII: Average score of the subject in the 2nd semester.
* Learning results in each semester and school year
For subjects assessed via both feedback and scores, DTBmhk is used to assess learning results of a student in each semester while DTBmcn is used to assess learning results of a student in the entire school year. Learning results of a student in each semester and in the entire school year shall be assessed by one of 4 categories: Excellent, Good, Qualified, Unqualified.
- Excellent:
+ All subjects assessed with feedback are placed in Qualified category.
+ All subjects assessed by both feedback and scores have minimum scores of 6.5 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn with 6 subjects among which have minimum scores of 8.0 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn.
- Good:
+ All subjects assessed with feedback are placed in Qualified category.
+ All subjects assessed by both feedback and scores have minimum scores of 5.0 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn with 6 subjects among which have minimum scores of 6.5 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn.
- Good:
+ Have no more than 1 subject assessed via feedback placed in Unqualified category.
+ At least 6 subjects assessed by both feedback and scores have minimum scores of 5.0 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn with 0 subjects have scores lower than 3.4 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn.
- Unqualified: Remaining cases.
* Revision of learning assessment results
If learning assessment results of a semester and/or a school year is lowered by at least 2 categories from categories under Point a and Point b Clause 2 of Article 9 of Circular 22/2021/TT-BGDDT due to assessment results of a single subject, the learning assessment results of the semester and/or school year shall be raised up to the adjacent category.
Assessment of training results of students according to the provisions of Article 8 of Circular 22/2021/TT-BGDDT as follows:
* Basis and organization of assessing learning results of students
- Assess training results of students based on requirements for traits and general capacity by subjects and education level under general programs and requirements for specific capacity under subject program in formal education program.
- Subject teachers shall rely on Point a of Clause 1 of Article 8 of Circular 22/2021/TT-BGDDT to provide feedback and assess training results, improvement, advantages, and disadvantages of students during training and learning process of the subjects.
- Class advisors shall rely on Point a of Clause 1 of Article 8 of Circular 22/2021/TT-BGDDT to monitor training and learning process of students; consult feedback and assessment of subject teachers and feedback of students’ parents, relevant, agencies, organizations, and individuals in educating students; instruct students on how to perform self-assessment; provide feedback and assess training results of students based on categories under Clause 2 of Article 8 of Circular 22/2021/TT-BGDDT.
* Training results of students in each semester and in the entire school year
Training results of students in each semester and in the entire school year shall be assessed by one of 4 categories: Excellent, Good, Qualified, Unqualified.
- Training results of students in each semester
+ Excellent: Satisfy requirements for traits under formal education program excellently and display merits.
+ Good: Satisfy requirements for traits under formal education program well and display merits but not enough to be placed in Excellent category.
+ Qualified: Satisfy requirements for traits under formal education program.
+ Unqualified: Fail to satisfy requirements for traits under formal education program.
- Training results of students in the entire school year
+ Excellent: a student is placed in Excellent category in the 2nd semester and in Good category or higher in the 1st semester.
+ Good: a student is placed in Good category in the 2nd semester and Qualified category or higher in the 1st semester; or Qualified category in the 2nd semester and Good category in the 1st semester; or Good category in the 2nd semester and Qualified category or Unqualified category in the 1st semester.
+ Qualified: a student is placed in Qualified category in the 2nd semester and Good, Qualified, or Unqualified category in the 1st category; or Good category in the 2nd semester and Unqualified in the 1st semester.
+ Unqualified: other cases.
Vo Van Hieu
Address: | 19 Nguyen Gia Thieu, Vo Thi Sau Ward, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City |
Phone: | (028) 7302 2286 |
E-mail: | info@lawnet.vn |