What are the criteria for assessing the quality of public non-business service using the state budget for civil servant training in Vietnam? What are the scales for this assessment? - Luu Trieu (Binh Phuoc)
Criteria for assessing the quality of public non-business services in Vietnam (Internet image)
According to Article 4 of Circular 07/2023/TT-BNV, the content and criteria for evaluating the quality of public non-business services funded by the state budget in the field of Home Affairs on fostering cadres, civil servants, and public employees including:
- Programs and documents;
- Student;
- Lecturers;
- Facilities and support activities;
- Training course;
- Effective training
According to Clauses 1 and 2, Article 5 of Circular 07/2023/TT-BNV, the assessment of service quality is carried out on the basis of the evaluation criteria stated in Circular 07/2023/TT-BNV using a 100-point scale.
Service quality is assessed on four levels:
Great: Total score of 80 points or more.
Good: The total score is from 70 points to less than 80 points.
Pass: The total score is from 50 points to less than 70 points.
Failed: Total score less than 50 points.
According to Clause 4, Article 5 of Circular 07/2023/TT-BNV, the assessment of service quality is as follows:
- The head of the ordering agency shall submit to the competent authority to establish a Service Quality Evaluation Council to determine the level of achievement as a basis for the acceptance of volume, quality, and payment for services.
- The Service Quality Evaluation Council has an odd number of members and at least 05 members, including: The Chairman is the head of the ordering agency; 01 Vice President is the deputy head of the ordering agency; members are representatives of related units and experts with experience in the field of training and retraining; 01 secretary of the Council.
- The Service Quality Evaluation Council works on the principles of democratic centralism and unified discussion. The survey results obtained from the quality assessment forms for fostering cadres, civil servants, and public employees (if any) are the basis for the Council to consider and evaluate the service quality.
4. Methods of assessing the quality of public non-business services using the state budget for civil servant training in Vietnam
According to Article 7 of Circular 07/2023/TT-BNV, the method of assessing the quality of public administrative services is as follows:
+ Quantitative assessment by scoring on the basis of weights, rating levels and summarizing evaluation scores according to each criterion, group of evaluation criteria.
+ The evaluation score for each group of criteria is determined on the basis of the total evaluation score of the component criteria in the group. The final evaluation score is the sum of the evaluation scores of all evaluation criteria groups after adjusting for the respective weights of each criterion.
Criteria for evaluating the quality of public non-business services using the state budget for civil servant training are specified in the Appendix issued under Circular 07/2023/TT-BNV as follows:
STT |
Evaluation Criteria |
Evaluation Criteria |
|
Weight |
Rating level |
||
A |
Criteria for evaluation of training programs and materials |
|
|
1 |
The goals of the program are clearly defined |
1 |
|
2 |
The program's output standards are clearly defined, meeting the requirements that students need to achieve after completing the program. |
1 |
|
3 |
The content of the document does not overlap with the content of other documents |
0.5 |
|
4 |
The content of the document ensures a combination of theory and practice |
0.5 |
|
5 |
The materials are compiled to ensure a balance between theory, discussion questions, practice and practical case exercises |
0.5 |
|
6 |
Structured documents, logical sequence; correct language, spelling and format |
0.5 |
|
7 |
The contribution of each section, each topic in the document to the achievement of output standards is clear |
0.5 |
|
8 |
The document is designed and compiled based on the output standard of the program |
0.5 |
|
B |
Criteria for evaluating students |
|
|
9 |
Actively exchange and discuss the topics of the training course |
0.5 |
|
10 |
Actively share practical experiences and real-life situations during the study period |
0.5 |
|
11 |
Follow the instructor's instructions well |
1 |
|
12 |
Fully comply with the provisions of the training course and of the training and retraining institution; training and research institutions |
1 |
|
C |
Criteria for evaluating lecturers |
|
|
13 |
The knowledge, skills and experience of the lecturers are relevant to the teaching content |
1 |
|
14 |
Instructors guide, encourage and promote students' practical experiences in the learning process |
0.5 |
|
15 |
Instructors strictly comply with the program's regulations, documents on time for theory lectures, discussions, practice and instructions for solving practical exercises and instructions for solving practical case exercises. |
1 |
|
16 |
The lecturer has a good expression of political ideology |
1 |
|
17 |
Instructors are polite and have a civilized and polite attitude in communicating with students |
0.5 |
|
18 |
Instructors use appropriate teaching methods to achieve the program's output standards |
1 |
|
D |
Criteria for evaluation of facilities and support activities |
|
|
19 |
Classrooms and equipment to meet teaching and learning requirements |
0.5 |
|
20 |
Teaching and learning materials and supplies meet the requirements of the course |
0.5 |
|
21 |
The logistics services for the course are provided in a timely manner, with quality assurance |
0.5 |
|
22 |
Employees of training and retraining institutions, training and research institutions have the appropriate spirit, attitude and responsibility. |
0.5 |
|
23 |
|
0.5 |
|
24 |
Examination and assessment of learning quality are appropriate, objective and accurate |
1 |
|
DD |
Criteria for evaluating the training course |
|
|
25 |
The content of the training course meets the needs of the students |
1 |
|
26 |
The course is practical and useful for students |
1 |
|
27 |
Students actively and actively participate in the learning activities of the training course |
0.5 |
|
28
|
The teaching work of the lecturers is well prepared |
1 |
|
29 |
The training course is organized methodically and scientifically |
1 |
|
30 |
The conditions for the refresher course are well met by the training, fostering, training and research institutions. |
0.5 |
|
E |
Criteria for evaluating training effectiveness |
|
|
31 |
After completing the refresher course, students' understanding of the field of study is enhanced |
1 |
|
32 |
Students use their skills to improve their work |
1 |
|
33 |
Students' attitudes (to work, colleagues, superiors) have positive changes |
1 |
|
34 |
The quality and efficiency of students' task performance are improved after training |
0.5 |
|
Circular 07/2023/TT-BNV takes effect on August 1, 2023.
Address: | 19 Nguyen Gia Thieu, Vo Thi Sau Ward, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City |
Phone: | (028) 7302 2286 |
E-mail: | info@lawnet.vn |