Methods of evaluating and classifying party organizations in Vietnam

Methods of evaluating and classifying party organizations in Vietnam (Internet image)

1. Criteria for evaluating and classifying party organizations in Vietnam

The framework of criteria for evaluating and classifying party organizations according to subsection 1.2, Section 1, Part II.B Instruction 21-HD/BTCTW dated October 18, 2019 is as follows:

* Criteria for building the Party and the political system:

- Political and ideological work: Propaganda and education of Marxism - Leninism, and Ho Chi Minh ideology; thoroughly grasping and implementing the guidelines of the Party, policies, and laws of the State;

Struggling with degrading manifestations of political ideology, morality, lifestyle, "self-evolution", "self-transformation" internally associated with promoting learning and following Ho Chi Minh's thought, morality, and style.

Fully and effectively carrying out regular, key, and extraordinary tasks in political and ideological work under the direction of the superior committees. Timely grasping the ideological situation of officials, party members, and people; ideological orientation for party members.

- Organization, cadre, and building of Party committees and branches: Results of organization, cadres, party members, and internal political protection.

The implementation of the principles of democratic centralism, self-criticism, and criticism, the working regulations of the Party Committees associated with building internal solidarity; renewing leadership methods and improving the quality of life of Party committees and branches; building a contingent of members and party secretaries;

Managing and assigning tasks to party members and admitting new party members; introducing working party members who regularly keep in contact with the branch committees and grassroots party committees where they reside. Results of building and replicating advanced examples; strengthening the party organization; and help and educating party members who fail to fulfill their duties.

- Leaders of government, the Fatherland Front, and socio-political organizations: Leaders in building strong organizations; promote the effectiveness and efficiency of the administration's management, consider and solve problems arising in localities, agencies, and units; results of work coordination; promote synergy, build great unity among the whole people; improve the quality of supervision and social criticism.

- Party inspection, supervision, and discipline: Results of the implementation of the inspection and supervision plan of the Party Committee and the self-inspection and supervision of the Party Committee and cell. Preventing and combating bureaucracy, corruption, wastefulness, and negativity; settling complaints and denunciations; detecting and handling violating party organizations and members.

* Criteria for the performance of assigned tasks in the year (specifically quantified):

- The concretization, formulation, and organization of implementation of annual work programs and plans to perform assigned tasks.

- Results of leadership in the implementation of socio-economic development, national defense, and security targets and tasks of localities, agencies, and units.

- Results of assessment and classification of the government, the Fatherland Front, socio-political organizations at the same level, and affiliated party organizations.

* The results of overcoming the limitations and weaknesses have been pointed out.

2. Standard framework of quality levels to evaluate and classify party organizations

According to subsection 1.3, Section 1, Part II.B, Instruction 21-HD/BTCTW dated October 18, 2019 stipulates the standard framework of quality levels for evaluating and classifying party organizations as follows:

* Successfully complete the task:

- Being a party cell with many outstanding achievements and innovations affirms its leading position and role, which is typical for other party organizations to learn from and follow.

- Criteria for the results of the implementation of the program and work plan on Party building and political system building; The results of leadership in carrying out the tasks of socio-economic development, national defense, and security assigned by competent authorities are all rated at the level of "Excellent"; The remaining criteria are assessed as "Good" or higher.

- For the Party committee, 100% of the affiliated party organizations must be classified with the quality "Complete the task" or higher, of which 80% are classified with the quality "Complete the task well" or higher.

For a cell, 100% of party members must be rated "Complete the task" or higher, of which 80% are classified as "Complete the task" or higher.

- The government, the Fatherland Front, and socio-political organizations at the same level shall be classified as "Complete tasks well" or higher.

The competent level shall consider and decide that the number of party organizations classified as "Excellent in completing tasks" must not exceed 20% of the number of party organizations of the same level classified as "Completing tasks well" of each party committee.

* Complete the task well:

- Criteria for the results of the implementation of the program and work plan on Party building and political system building;

The results of leadership in performing socio-economic development, national defense, and security tasks assigned by competent authorities are all rated at the level of "Good" or higher; The rest of the criteria are assessed as "Average" or higher.

- For the Party committee, 100% of its affiliated party organizations must be rated "Complete the task" or higher, of which 50% are rated "Complete the task" or higher.

For a cell, 100% of party members must be rated "Complete the task" or higher, of which 50% will be classified as "Complete the task" or higher.

- The government, the Fatherland Front, and socio-political organizations at the same level are rated "Complete tasks" or higher.

* Complete mission:

- All criteria are rated as "Average" or higher.

- Party organizations are not disciplined (except in cases where they are disciplined but discover and overcome the consequences by themselves).

* Failure to complete the mission:

Being a party cell (cell) that does not reach the level of "Complete tasks" or in one of the following cases:

- Completing less than 50% of socio-economic development, defense, and security targets and tasks assigned by competent authorities (except for force majeure cases) or programs and plans on Party building, building the political system of the Party committee is at a low level.

- There are two organizations in the group: the Fatherland Front, socio-political organizations of the same level that have the quality rating of "Failed to fulfill the task".

- Party organizations are disciplined.

- Party committees with more than 20% of affiliated party organizations are classified as "Failing to fulfill their tasks", grassroots branches with more than 20% of Party members are classified as "Failing to complete tasks".

3. Responsibility and authority to evaluate and classify party organizations in Vietnam

Responsibility and authority to assess and classify party organizations according to subsection 1.4, Section 1, Part II.B Instruction 21-HD/BTCTW dated October 18, 2019 are as follows:

* For the evaluation and classification of district-level party committees:

- Standing Committee of the Provincial Party Committee, the Party Committee, and the Party Committee directly under the Central Government (hereinafter referred to as the Standing Committee of the Provincial Party Committee) assume the prime responsibility for, organize the implementation, and consider and decide to evaluate and rank the quality of the affiliated party committees.

- District-llevel committees self-evaluate and rank the quality of their party committees.

* For the assessment and classification of grassroots party organizations:

- The Standing Committee of the district-level Party Committee shall assume the prime responsibility for organizing the implementation, and consider and decide on the evaluation and quality rating of the Party committees and branches of the grassroots affiliated.

- The grassroots party committees (cells where there are no committees) self-evaluate and rank the quality of their own party committees and branches.

4. Methods of evaluating and classifying party organizations in Vietnam

According to subsection 1.5, Section 1, Part II.B, Instruction 21-HD/BTCTW dated October 18, 2019 stipulates methods of evaluating and classifying party organizations in Vietnam as follows:

* Step 1: Self-assessment, quality rating

Based on the 4 levels (excellent, good, average, and poor) of each evaluation criteria that have been concretized by the provincial Party Committee and the quality level standards prescribed for each type of party organization, the standing committee of the party committee, the branch committee for the cell (cells where there is no branch committee) self-evaluate and classify as follows:

- Analyze the achieved results to rank each evaluation criterion according to the level of "Excellent" or "Good" or "Average" or "Poor" in the corresponding box in Form 01.

- Based on the self-assessment results in Form No. 01, the meeting of the executive committee of the party committee (cell) discusses and votes by secret ballot to determine the quality rating of the party committee or cell according to one of four levels. (excellently complete the task, complete the task well, complete the task, not complete the task), report to the superior committee.

Form No. 01

* Step 2: Subjects participate in quality assessment and rating

- For the assessment and classification of district-level party committees: The organizing committee of the provincial Party Committee, after summarizing and appraising the results of the self-assessment, sends it to collect comments and ratings from relevant subjects at the provincial level (subjects and contents of the opinion collection shall be prescribed by the provincial Party Committee).

- For the assessment and classification of grassroots party organizations: After summarizing and appraising the results of the self-assessment, the organizing committee of the district-level Party Committee sends it to collect opinions and ratings from relevant subjects at the district level (subjects and contents of the opinion collection shall be prescribed by the provincial Party Committee).

* Step 3: Decide to evaluate and rank the quality

Organizing committee at the competent level shall assume the prime responsibility for, and coordinate with relevant agencies in, summarizing and appraising the results of the self-assessment and the results of participation in the assessment of the subjects to report to the standing committee of the provincial-level Party Committee (for the evaluation and classification of the quality of district-level party committees);

Or the standing committee of the district-level Party Committee (for the assessment and classification of the quality of grassroots party organizations) considers and decides on the quality classification of affiliated party organizations.

Quoc Dat

>> CLICK HERE TO READ THIS ARTICLE IN VIETNAMESE