Contents of Criterion 16 "Accessibility of law" under the advanced national set of criteria for new rural communes in Vietnam for the period 2021 – 2025

No.

Criteria content

Standards 

Evaluation documents

1

There is a typical model of law dissemination and education and a typical model of grassroots mediation

1.1

Typical model of law dissemination and education

a) Indicators 3, 4, 5 and 6 under Criterion 2 "Access to information, dissemination of legal education" according to the provisions of Decision No. 25/2021/QD-TTg and Circular No. 09/2021 /TT-BTP achieved maximum score

According to the provisions of criteria 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Criterion 2, Appendix I issued with Circular No. 09/2021/TT-BTP

b) Mobilize resources to support law dissemination and education

Documents of sponsoring and supporting organizations and individuals (notifications, official dispatches, contracts, reports, lists...) on sponsorship, support, and contribution of resources (funds, human resources, facilities, etc.) facilities, other conditions) serving the dissemination and education of the law.

c) In the last 5 years up to the time of assessment, has a group or individual been awarded a Certificate of Merit or other form of commendation by a competent authority at district level or higher for outstanding achievements in implementation? solutions and initiatives in law dissemination and education

- Certificates of Merit, Certificates of Merit, Commendation Decisions from competent agencies at district level or higher for collectives and individuals with outstanding achievements in implementing solutions and initiatives in the work of disseminating and educating the law. the law

- Application for reward (Decision to recognize solutions, initiatives or achievement reports).

1.2

Typical model of grassroots reconciliation

a) Criterion 2 under Criterion 3 "Grassroots mediation, legal aid" as prescribed in Decision No. 25/2021/QD-TTg and Circular No. 09/2021/TT-BTP achieved the maximum score Multi

According to the provisions in criterion 2 of Criterion 3, Appendix I issued with Circular No. 09/2021/TT-BTP

b) Mobilize a team of lawyers, jurists, People's Jurors, People's Public Security forces, Border Guards, legal reporters, legal propagandists, and forces participating in security protection, order at the grassroots level, people who have been Judges, Prosecutors, Investigators, people who have worked or are currently working in the legal field, participating as mediators at the grassroots level or supporting mediation work at the grassroots level. basis

Records and documents (plans, invitations, lists, reports, decisions to recognize mediators...) showing the participation of one of the subjects being lawyers, jurists, people's jurors , People's Police force, Border Guard, law reporters, law propagandists, forces involved in protecting security and order at the grassroots, people who have served as judges and prosecutors , Investigators, people who have worked or are currently working in the legal field as mediators at the grassroots level or provide legal support, advise the mediation team to resolve cases, or participate in training and fostering for mediator/mediation team…

c) In the last 5 years up to the time of assessment, has a group or individual been awarded a Certificate of Merit or other form of commendation by a competent authority at district level or higher for outstanding achievements in implementation? solutions and initiatives in grassroots conciliation work

- Certificates of Merit, Certificates of Merit, Commendation Decisions from competent authorities at district level or higher for agencies, organizations and individuals for outstanding achievements in implementing solutions and initiatives in conciliation work at the facility.

- Application for reward (Decision to recognize solutions, initiatives or achievement reports).

2

Percentage of conflicts, disputes, and violations within the scope of grassroots conciliation that are successfully conciliated (hereinafter referred to as successful cases and conciliations)

Percentage % = (Total number of successful cases and conciliations/Total number of conciliated cases and cases) x 100

≥ 90%

According to the provisions of criterion 1 (content 2) of Criterion 3, Appendix I issued with Circular No. 09/2021/TT-BTP

3

Percentage of people eligible for legal aid accessing and receiving legal aid upon request

Percentage % = (Total number of people eligible for legal aid receiving legal aid/Total number of people eligible for legal aid requesting legal aid) x 100

≥ 90%

Data on the total number of people eligible for legal aid in the commune requesting legal aid and data on the total number of people eligible for legal aid in the commune receiving legal aid provided by the Center. Compiled and provided state legal aid.