Hello, Lawnet would like to answer the following:
According to the provisions of Article 22 of Decision 657/QD-TCT, regulations on the eimbursement liability of law enforcers, as follows:
- The law enforcers at fault causing damage is obliged to refund to the state budget part or all of the amount of money that the State has compensated the damage sufferer.
- Where there are more than one law enforcers causing damage together, those persons are obliged to compensate in proportion to the extent of their fault and the damage for which the State must compensate.
According to Article 60 of the Law on State Compensation Liability:
- The State shall allocate a state budget fund to fulfill the state's compensation liability. The compensation funding includes:
+ Damages for the sufferer;
+ Expenses associated with asset valuation and damage examination.
- If the compensation body is allocated operational fund from the central budget, the compensation funding shall be covered by the central budget.
- If the compensation body is allocated operational fund from the local budget, the compensation funding shall be covered by the provincial budget.
Thus, the State is responsible for allocating an amount of funds in the state budget fund to fulfill the state's compensation liability. After that, the law enforcers who is at fault for causing damage is obliged to refund to the state budget part or all of the amount of money that the State has compensated the damage sufferer.
According to the provisions of Article 65 of the Law on State Compensation Liability, the determination of refund rates and reduction of refund rates is as follows:
- Grounds for determination of reimbursed amounts comprise:
+ The degree of fault of law enforcers;
+ Amount paid by the State.
- If a law enforcer causes damage, the refund shall be determined as follows:
+ If the law enforcer caused damage with intentional fault and a judgment which states that he/she committed a crime, he/she has to refund all the money already paid by the State to the sufferer;
+ If the law enforcer caused damage with intentional fault but not to the extent of being prosecuted for penal liability, his/her 30 to 50 months’ pay rate shall be refunded at the time the refund decision is issued but not exceeding 50% of the amount of damages paid by the State;
+ If the law enforcer caused damage with unintentional fault, his/her 3 to 5 months’ pay rate shall be refunded at the time the refund decision is issued but not exceeding 50% of the amount of damages paid by the State;
+ Where the 50% of the amount of damages is less than the 30 months’ pay rate prescribed at Point b of this Clause or less than 3 months’ pay rate prescribed at Point c of this Clause, the law enforcer must pay at least 50% of the amount of damages paid by the State.
- In a case where multiple law enforcers jointly cause damage, the reimbursement rate of each person shall be determined correspondingly according to the provisions of Clause 2 of this Article, but the total reimbursement shall not exceed the amount of damages already paid by the State for the sufferer.
- Each law enforcer shall be entitled to reduced reimbursement when they fully meet the following conditions:
+ Proactively overcoming the consequences;
+ To fulfill all obligations in the process of claim settlement and have repaid at least 50% of the amount to be reimbursed;
+ He/she is economically disadvantaged.
Thus, the basis for determining the level of reimbursement of the law enforcers will be based on the degree of fault of the law enforcers and the amount of compensation the State has paid for the State to request the law enforcers to refund.
The corresponding reimbursement rate is based on the salary of the damage-causing law enforcers specified in Articles 26 and 27 of Decree 68/2018/ND-CP.
Please Login to be able to download