According to Article 472 of the Civil Code 2015 regarding asset lease agreements:
Asset Lease Agreement
An asset lease agreement is an agreement between parties, whereby the lessor delivers an asset to the lessee for use over a certain period, and the lessee must pay rent.
A residential lease agreement, or a lease for other purposes, shall be executed in accordance with the provisions of this Code, the Housing Law, and other relevant legal regulations.
Therefore, from the above regulation, it can be understood that a lease agreement for premises is a document that records the agreement between parties, whereby the lessor delivers the premises to the lessee for use over a specified period to conduct activities according to the committed purpose and rent must be paid.
Simultaneously, the lessee and the lessor must comply with the obligation to ensure the usability value of the leased asset as prescribed in Article 477 of the Civil Code 2015 as follows:
- The lessor must ensure that the leased asset is in the agreed condition, suitable for the purpose of the lease throughout the lease term; must repair any damages or defects of the leased asset, except for minor damages that the lessee must customarily fix themselves.
In case the leased asset's usability value is reduced not due to the lessee's fault, the lessee has the right to ask the lessor to perform one or several of the following measures:
+ Repair the asset;
+ Reduce the rent;
+ Exchange for another asset or unilaterally terminate the contract and request compensation if the leased asset has defects that the lessee was unaware of or the asset cannot be repaired, thus defeating the purpose of the lease.
- If the lessor, having been notified, fails to repair or does not promptly repair, the lessee may make repairs to the leased asset at a reasonable cost but must inform the lessor and may request the lessor to cover the repair costs.
No. | Judgment Title | Level of Trial | Court of Trial |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Judgment 83/2024/KDTM-PT on a dispute over a lease agreement for premises | Appellate | People's Court of Hanoi City |
2 | Judgment 32/2024/KDTM-PT on a dispute over a lease agreement for premises and asset | Appellate | People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City |
3 | Judgment 03/2024/KDTM-PT on a dispute over a lease agreement for premises | Appellate | People's Court of Da Nang City |
4 | Judgment 10/2023/KDTM-PT on a dispute over a business lease agreement for premises | Appellate | People's Court of Binh Dinh Province |
5 | Judgment on a dispute over a lease agreement for premises number 01/2022/KDTM-ST | First instance | People's Court of Dong Son District, Thanh Hoa Province |
6 | Judgment on a dispute over a real estate business agreement number 14/2022/KDTM-PT | Appellate | People's Court of Da Nang City |
7 | Judgment on a dispute over a business lease agreement for premises and reclaiming leased asset number 440/2021/KDTM-PT | Appellate | People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City |
8 | Judgment on a dispute over a lease agreement for premises number 295/2021/KDTM-PT | Appellate | People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City |
9 | Judgment 01/2021/KDTM-PT dated January 22, 2021, on a dispute over a lease agreement for premises | Appellate | People's Court of Binh Duong Province |
10 | Judgment 708/2020/KDTM-PT on a dispute over a lease agreement for premises | Appellate | People's Court of City H |
11 | Judgment on a dispute over a lease agreement for premises number 164/2020/KDTM-PT | Appellate | People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City |
12 | Judgment 121/2020/KDTM-PT on a dispute over leasing premises | Appellate | People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City |
13 | Judgment 1195/2019/KDTM-PT on a dispute over a lease agreement for premises | Appellate | People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City |
14 | Judgment 77/2019/KDTM-ST dated November 22, 2019, on a dispute over a lease agreement for premises | First instance | People's Court of Thu Duc District, Ho Chi Minh City |
15 | Judgment on a dispute over a lease agreement for premises number 01/2019/KDTM-ST | First instance | People's Court of Di An District-level Town, Binh Duong Province |
16 | Judgment 01/2019/KDTM-ST dated February 21, 2019, on a dispute over a lease agreement for premises | First instance | People's Court of Di An District-level Town, Binh Duong Province |
17 | Judgment 207/2018/KDTM-PT on a dispute over a lease agreement for premises | Appellate | People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City |
18 | Judgment 06/2017/KDTM-PT dated August 16, 2017, on a dispute over a commercial business lease agreement for premises, contract violation penalties, and compensation for unilateral contract cancellation | Appellate | People's Court of Lam Dong Province |
19 | Judgment 17/2017/KDTM-ST dated August 4, 2017, regarding a requirement to fulfill the obligation to pay rent for premises | First instance | People's Court of Hai Chau District, Da Nang City |
Please Login to be able to download