What are the guidelines for preparing the outline of a high-scoring social argumentative essay on ideology and morality for 9th-grade students in Vietnam? What are the regulations on the assessment of training results of 9th-grade students in Vietnam?

What are the guidelines for preparing the outline of a high-scoring social argumentative essay on ideology and morality for 9th-grade students in Vietnam? What are the regulations on the assessment of training results of 9th-grade students in Vietnam?

What are the guidelines for preparing the outline of a high-scoring social argumentative essay on ideology and morality for 9th-grade students in Vietnam?

9th-grade students can refer to the following guidelines for preparing the outline of a high-scoring social argumentative essay on ideology and morality:

Guidelines for preparing the outline of a high-scoring social argumentative essay on ideology and morality


I. Introduction:

Opening Hook:

An intriguing question, a famous quote, or a surprising statement related to the topic of discussion.

Example: "There is a saying: 'Life is a long journey, and each of us is an explorer.' But on such a journey, can we always uphold moral values?", "In today's modern society, where materialism is increasingly emphasized, does humanistic spirit still hold its original position?"

Introduction of the Topic:

Clearly state the topic to be discussed in a brief and concise manner.

Example: "This essay will discuss the issue of morality in modern society."

Main Argument:

Clearly state your own standpoint on the issue.

Example: "I believe that morality is the foundation of society, and each individual must be conscious of preserving and promoting good moral values."

II. Body:

Explanation of the Issue:

Explain clearly what the issue is and why it is important.

Provide specific evidence and examples to illustrate the issue.

Analyze Different Aspects of the Issue:

Positive aspects: Highlight the positive sides or values of the issue.

Negative aspects: Highlight the limitations or harms of the issue.

Discuss and Prove the Argument:

Provide sub-arguments to support the main argument.

Each sub-argument should have convincing evidence and reasoning.

Use logical tactics: comparison, contrast, synthesis, analysis...

Present Various Opinions:

Illustrate different viewpoints on the issue.

Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each opinion.

Supplement with Real Evidence:

Evidence from life, history, literature, art...

Evidence from scientific research, statistics...

III. Conclusion:

Reaffirm the Issue:

Reiterate the discussed topic.

Summarize the Main Ideas:

Briefly recap the main points presented in the body.

Provide a Moral Lesson:

Draw a lesson for oneself and others.

A Call to Action:

Urge everyone to join hands to solve the issue.

*Note:

Introduction: Must grab the reader's attention from the beginning.

Body: Ideas must be presented logically, coherently, and closely linked.

Conclusion: Must wrap up the issue completely and leave a strong impression.

Language: Use precise, image-rich, emotionally-rich language.

Evidence: Evidence must be accurate, convincing, and diverse.

*Examples of Some Social Dialogue Topics:

The Role of Family in Educating Children

The Harm of Excessive Use of Social Media

The Meaning of Friendship

The Concept of Happiness

*Note: Information is for reference only./.

How to outline a high-scoring social discussion on ideology and morality in Grade 9? How to evaluate the training results of Grade 9 students?

What are the guidelines for preparing the outline of a high-scoring social argumentative essay on ideology and morality for 9th-grade students in Vietnam? What are the regulations on the assessment of training results of 9th-grade students in Vietnam? (Image from the Internet)

What are the regulations on the assessment of training results of 9th-grade students in Vietnam?

According to Article 8 of Circular 22/2021/TT-BGDDT, the assessment of training results of 9th-grade students in Vietnam is regulated as follows:

1. Basis and organization of assessing learning results of students

- Assess training results of students based on requirements for traits and general capacity by subjects and education level under general programs and requirements for specific capacity under subject program in formal education program.

- Subject teachers shall rely on Point a of this Clause to provide feedback and assess training results, improvement, advantages, and disadvantages of students during training and learning process of the subjects.

- Class advisors shall rely on Point a of this Clause to monitor training and learning process of students; consult feedback and assessment of subject teachers and feedback of students’ parents, relevant, agencies, organizations, and individuals in educating students; instruct students on how to perform self-assessment; provide feedback and assess training results of students based on categories under Clause 2 of this Article.

2. Training results of students in each semester and in the entire school year

Training results of students in each semester and in the entire school year shall be assessed by one of 4 categories: Excellent, Good, Qualified, Unqualified.

- Training results of students in each semester

+ Excellent: Satisfy requirements for traits under formal education program excellently and display merits.

= Good: Satisfy requirements for traits under formal education program well and display merits but not enough to be placed in Excellent category.

+ Qualified: Satisfy requirements for traits under formal education program.

+ Unqualified: Fail to satisfy requirements for traits under formal education program.

- Training results of students in the entire school year

+ Excellent: a student is placed in Excellent category in the 2nd semester and in Good category or higher in the 1st semester.

+ Good: a student is placed in Good category in the 2nd semester and Qualified category or higher in the 1st semester; or Qualified category in the 2nd semester and Good category in the 1st semester; or Good category in the 2nd semester and Qualified category or Unqualified category in the 1st semester.

+ Qualified: a student is placed in Qualified category in the 2nd semester and Good, Qualified, or Unqualified category in the 1st category; or Good category in the 2nd semester and Unqualified in the 1st semester.

+ Unqualified: other cases.

What are the regulations on the assessment of learning results in the first semester of 9th-grade students in Vietnam?

According to Article 9 of Circular 22/2021/TT-BGDDT, the assessment of learning results in the first semester of 9th-grade students in Vietnam is as follows:

1. Learning results of students by subjects

- For subjects assessed via feedback

+ In a semester, learning results of each subject of a student shall be concluded as either: “Đạt” (Qualified), or “Chưa đạt” (Unqualified).

++ Qualified: When the student attends all examination and assessment under this Circular and obtain assessment at Qualified category.

++ Unqualified: Remaining cases.

+ In a school year, learning results of each subject of a student shall be concluded as either: “Đạt” (Qualified), or “Chưa đạt” (Unqualified).

++ Qualified: Learning results of the 2nd semester is placed in Qualified category.

++ Unqualified: Learning results of the 2nd semester is placed in Unqualified category.

- For subjects assessed via both feedback and scores

+ Average score of a subject in a semester (hereinafter referred to as “DTBmhk”) is calculated as follows:

DTBmhk =

TDDGtx + 2 x DDGgk + 3 x DDGck

Number of DDGtx+ 5

 

TDDGtx: Total scores of regular assessment.

+ Average scores of the subject for the entire school year (referred to as “DTBmcn”) is calculated as follows:

DTBmcn =

DTBmhkI + 2 x DTBmhkII

3

 

DTBmhkI: Average score of the subject in the 1st semester.

DTBmhkII: Average score of the subject in the 2nd semester.

2. Learning results in each semester and school year

For subjects assessed via both feedback and scores, DTBmhk is used to assess learning results of a student in each semester while DTBmcn is used to assess learning results of a student in the entire school year. Learning results of a student in each semester and in the entire school year shall be assessed by one of 4 categories: Excellent, Good, Qualified, Unqualified.

a) Excellent:

- All subjects assessed with feedback are placed in Qualified category.

- All subjects assessed by both feedback and scores have minimum scores of 6.5 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn with 6 subjects among which have minimum scores of 8.0 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn.

b) Good:

- All subjects assessed with feedback are placed in Qualified category.

- All subjects assessed by both feedback and scores have minimum scores of 5.0 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn with 6 subjects among which have minimum scores of 6.5 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn.

c) Qualified:

- Have no more than 1 subject assessed via feedback placed in Unqualified category.

- At least 6 subjects assessed by both feedback and scores have minimum scores of 5.0 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn with 0 subjects have scores lower than 3.4 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn.

d) Unqualified: Remaining cases.

3. Revision of learning assessment results

If learning assessment results of a semester and/or a school year is lowered by at least 2 categories from categories under Point a and Point b Clause 2 of this Article due to assessment results of a single subject, the learning assessment results of the semester and/or school year shall be raised up to the adjacent category.

Related Posts
LawNet
What are the Top 19+ pieces of evidence for social argumentation? How much percentage do writing skills in the 9th-grade Literature curriculum in Vietnam account for?
LawNet
What are the 02 sample argumentative essays on students' snacking? What are the duties and rights of lower secondary school students in Vietnam?
LawNet
What are the sample explanatory essays on traditional dishes for the Lunar New Year 2025? What are the 04 requirements for assessing 9th-grade students in Vietnam?
LawNet
What are the guidelines for preparing the outline of a high-scoring social argumentative essay on ideology and morality for 9th-grade students in Vietnam? What are the regulations on the assessment of training results of 9th-grade students in Vietnam?
LawNet
What are the sample paragraphs expressing feelings about a six-eight poem in Vietnam? How many periodic assessments must 9th-grade students in Vietnam undergo during a semester?
LawNet
What are the sample argumentative essays on lacking life skills by students in Vietnam? What are the forms of regular assessment for 9th-grade students in Vietnam?
LawNet
What are the Top 10 sample introductions for social argumentative essays on any topic in 2025? What are the objectives of the lower secondary education program for 9th-grade students in Vietnam?
LawNet
What is laziness? What is the specific evidence of laziness? What are the sample 200-word paragraphs about laziness? What are the regulations on regular assessments for 9th-grade Literature in Vietnam?
LawNet
What are the sample essays recounting a social activity for 8th-grade students? Is littering in the park one of the prohibited acts for lower secondary school students in Vietnam?
LawNet
What are the sample argumentative essays on littering in schools for 9th-grade students in Vietnam? What are the regulations on assessment via scores for 9th-grade students in Vietnam?
Lượt xem: 14

Đăng ký tài khoản Lawnet

Đơn vị chủ quản: Công ty THƯ VIỆN PHÁP LUẬT.
Chịu trách nhiệm chính: Ông Bùi Tường Vũ - Số điện thoại liên hệ: 028 3935 2079
P.702A , Centre Point, 106 Nguyễn Văn Trỗi, P.8, Q. Phú Nhuận, TP. HCM;