Vietnam: What is the sample subject-based feedback of 11th-grade students in the 2024-2025 school year according to Circular 22?

What is the sample subject-based feedback of 11th-grade students in the 2024-2025 school year according to Circular 22? What are the assessment levels for learning results in the entire school year of 11th-grade students in Vietnam?

What is the sample subject-based feedback of 11th-grade students in the 2024-2025 school year according to Circular 22?

At the end of each semester, teachers at various levels will provide feedback for the student records regarding their abilities, qualities, achievements, and efforts.

In Clause 1, Article 9 of Circular 22/2021/BDGDT, students' learning results by subject are specifically assessed at the following levels:

+ Qualified: When the student attends all examination and assessment under this Circular and obtain assessment at Qualified category.

+ Unqualified: Remaining cases.

We have collected the following sample subject-based feedback of 11th-grade students in the 2024-2025 school year according to Circular 22 to assist teachers in easily providing feedback on their students:

Feedback on Mathematics

Qualified:

- The student has completed all required tests and achieved good results. Continue to develop logical thinking and problem-solving skills for higher achievements.

- The student's performance meets the requirements, with solid basic math skills. Strive for further development next term.

- The student completed all tests with good results. Their computational skills and logical thinking are developing. Continue practicing to tackle more challenging problems.

Unqualified:

- The student has not completed the required number of tests, and the results do not meet the requirements. Efforts are needed to improve basic math knowledge and skills.

- Results do not meet requirements. Additional reviewing and attention to tests are needed to improve scores.

- The student has not completed the required number of tests, and the results do not meet the requirements. More practice with mathematical formulas and regular problem-solving is needed.
Feedback on Literature

Qualified:

- The student has performed well on tests and met the requirements. Improvement in expression and textual analysis skills is evident. Maintain this effort next term.

- The student achieved good test results, demonstrating a strong understanding of literature. Continue to develop creative thinking and writing skills.

- The student completed tests satisfactorily. The student's literary appreciation is quite good. Keep fostering creativity in writing and analyzing works.

Unqualified:

- The student has not completed the required number of tests and results do not meet requirements. Focus is needed on enhancing reading comprehension and writing skills.

- Efforts are needed to improve writing skills and complete tests to meet academic requirements.

- The student has not fulfilled the necessary number of tests and results do not meet requirements. Improvement in work analysis skills and articulating ideas more coherently is needed.
Feedback on Chemistry

Qualified:

- Actively participates in classroom discussions. Shows talent in Chemistry. Good academic results.

- Responsible, diligent in completing academic tasks. Active in class discussions. Performs well on academic projects.

- The student is excellent, well-behaved, has a conscious learning attitude, is diligent, and actively participates in group activities. Very commendable.

- The student is active, dynamic, performs well in group activities, has a conscious self-study habit, and should continue to enhance it.

- The student pays close attention to teacher lectures, is hardworking, diligent, has a spontaneous learning attitude, actively builds study plans as suggested by the teacher.

Unqualified:

- Self-study ability is not good. Lack of effort in studying. Slow progress.

- The student is weak in analyzing problems and not self-motivated, needs to be more diligent to improve scores.

- Not active in studying. Academic results are average.

- Lacks effort and is passive in studying, leading to low results.

- Lack of effort, resulting in low academic achievement.

- Lacks effort, slow progress in studying.

- There is effort in learning but still shy and passive in completing academic tasks.

- Self-study ability is low. Slow progress.
Feedback on Physics

Qualified:

- The student has knowledge of the main topics of Physics.

- The student can apply knowledge to solve problems and conduct experiments well.

- The student has studied and understood well topics like mechanics, oscillation, waves, electromagnetism,...

- The student can solve practical application problems like calculating force on an object, determining the oscillation frequency of an object,...

- The student can successfully perform experiments such as determining gravitational acceleration, measuring wave speed,...

- The student has good experimental skills, knows how to use equipment and accurately record experimental results.

- The student has good problem-solving skills, knows how to apply physics formulas to solve problems.

- The student has good logical thinking skills, knows how to analyze and solve problems.

Unqualified:

- The student has not completed the required number of tests, and the results do not meet the requirements. Efforts are needed to improve basic math knowledge and skills.

- There is effort in learning but still shy and passive in completing academic tasks.

- Results do not meet requirements, additional reviewing and focus on tests are needed to improve scores.

- Not meeting subject requirements, passive, not self-motivated in studying and group activities, needs to enhance practical skills.
Feedback on Informatics

Qualified:

- Mastered course knowledge and applies it well in practice.

- Proficient in practical skills.

- Completes course content well.

- Effectively applies learned knowledge to practice sessions.

Unqualified:

- Has not completed the required subject requirements, passive, increase practice in skills.

- Does not meet subject requirements, passive, lacks self-motivation in learning and group activities, needs more practice in skills.

- Meets subject requirements, becomes more proactive in learning, enhances practical skills training.
Feedback on Technology

Qualified:

- Responsible, diligent in completing academic tasks. Active in class discussions. Performs well on academic projects.

- The student can independently complete learning tasks, listens well, respects others' opinions, confidently expresses personal views. Shows good technological awareness and skill application.

- The student works well in groups to fulfill tasks, effectively handles arising situations. Demonstrates good technological awareness and skill application.

- The student is self-directed, autonomous, shows great teamwork spirit, and resolves assigned tasks well. Demonstrates good technological awareness and skill application.

Unqualified:

- Has not completed the required subject requirements, passive, increase practice in skills.

- Does not meet subject requirements, passive, lacks self-motivation in learning and group activities, needs more practice in skills.

- Meets subject requirements, becomes more proactive in learning, enhances practical skills training.
Feedback on Civic Education

Qualified:

- Knows how to handle situations in the lesson well.

- Knows how to introduce and resolve situations according to lesson content.

- Applies lesson content to real life well.

- Practices learned ethical behavior in life.

- Polite, well-mannered. Demonstrates appropriate ethical behavior in practice.

- Understands learned ethical behavior and completes assignments well.

Unqualified:

- Lacks basic reading comprehension skills and very weak application ability, needs more effort.

- Lacks knowledge but insufficient effort in studying.

- Has not completed the required subject requirements, passive, increase practice in skills.

Note: Information is for reference purposes only!

Summary of Grade 11 Student Remarks by Subject for Academic Year 2024-2025?

What is the sample subject-based feedback of 11th-grade students in the 2024-2025 school year according to Circular 22? (Image from Internet)

What is the basis for assessing the training results of 11th-grade students in Vietnam?

Under Clause 1, Article 8 of Circular 22/2021/BDGDTthe basis for assessing the training results of 11th-grade students in Vietnam is stipulated as follows:

1) Assess training results of students based on requirements for traits and general capacity by subjects and education level under general programs and requirements for specific capacity under subject program in formal education program.

2) Subject teachers shall rely on (1) to provide feedback and assess training results, improvement, advantages, and disadvantages of students during training and learning process of the subjects.

3) Class advisors shall rely on (1) to monitor training and learning process of students; consult feedback and assessment of subject teachers and feedback of students’ parents, relevant, agencies, organizations, and individuals in educating students; instruct students on how to perform self-assessment; provide feedback and assess training results of students based on categories under Clause 2, Article 8 of Circular 22/2021/BDGDT.

What are the assessment levels for learning results in the entire school year of 11th-grade students in Vietnam?

According to Clause 2, Article 9 of Circular 22/2021/TT-BGDDT, there are 4 assessment levels for learning results in the entire school year of 11th-grade students in Vietnam as follows:

1) Excellent:

- All subjects assessed with feedback are placed in Qualified category.

- All subjects assessed by both feedback and scores have minimum scores of 6.5 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn with 6 subjects among which have minimum scores of 8.0 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn.

2) Good:

- All subjects assessed with feedback are placed in Qualified category.

- All subjects assessed by both feedback and scores have minimum scores of 5.0 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn with 6 subjects among which have minimum scores of 6.5 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn.

3) Qualified:

- Have no more than 1 subject assessed via feedback placed in Unqualified category.

- At least 6 subjects assessed by both feedback and scores have minimum scores of 5.0 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn with 0 subjects have scores lower than 3.4 for DTBmhk and DTBmcn.

4) Unqualified: Remaining cases.

Related Posts
LawNet
What are the guidelines for making a summary report of the first semester of the 2024-2025 academic year for secondary levels in Ho Chi Minh City?
LawNet
What are the report templates on the projected enrollment to 1st grade, 6th grade, and 10th grade for the 2025-2026 school year of the Ho Chi Minh City Department of Education and Training?
LawNet
What does the periodic assessment of primary school students refer to? What are the learning rights of primary school students in Vietnam?
LawNet
Who gives the most important assessments to primary school students in Vietnam?
LawNet
What are the regulations on the prizes of the exam for the selection of excellent students at the national level in Vietnam? What are the 04 rights of students achieving the prizes of national excellent students in Vietnam?
LawNet
What are the Top 20 sample feedbacks to lower secondary school students at the end of the first semester of the 2024–2025 school year in Vietnam?
LawNet
What is the newest summary table of the 04 assessment levels for primary school students in Vietnam? How many levels are there for periodic exam questions of primary school students in Vietnam?
LawNet
What are the guidelines for giving self-assessments regarding training results by students in Vietnam for the 2024-2025 academic year? What are the responsibilities of homeroom teachers in assessing primary school students in Vietnam?
LawNet
What are the guidelines for giving feedback on English by teachers in Vietnam according to Circular 27? What are the requirements regarding assessment for English?
LawNet
What is the self-assessment sheet form for training results by upper secondary school students in Vietnam? What are the guidelines for filling out the self-assessment sheet form?
Lượt xem: 63

Đăng ký tài khoản Lawnet

Đơn vị chủ quản: Công ty THƯ VIỆN PHÁP LUẬT.
Chịu trách nhiệm chính: Ông Bùi Tường Vũ - Số điện thoại liên hệ: 028 3935 2079
P.702A , Centre Point, 106 Nguyễn Văn Trỗi, P.8, Q. Phú Nhuận, TP. HCM;